Why Hyperlocals Are Missing Out on Engagement

“Engagement,” just about everyone agrees, is a must, especially for news websites, most especially hyperlocals.  But engagement metrics for news – even allowing for sometimes wildly conflicting numbers produced from different methodologies – are mostly grim.  The average Facebook user spends a half hour-plus on that paragon of digital engagement.  News sites get minutes that can be counted on one hand.  Taking into account murky Web analytics, only a fraction of that time – about three minutes for most hyperlocal news sites, according to Alexa – represents engagement where the site has captured the user’s undivided attention.

There were even grimmer numbers in the much-discussed September, 2010, American Journalism Review article “The Hazards of Hyperlocal” by Barbara Palser.  The nut graphs:

“According to a survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, only 20 percent of American adults reported using digital tools to communicate with their neighbors or stay informed about community issues at least once in the past year. Only one in 10 reported reading a community blog at least once in the past year.

“Assuming Pew’s findings are reasonably accurate, the potential audience seeking neighborhood news in a given community would be roughly 20 percent of the population–including both frequent and infrequent users. Now consider the competition of multiple hyperlocal sites and bloggers, established community newspapers, and aggregators such as Topix.com and Outside.in. Not to mention other sources of local information such as online directories, event calendars and government sites. The math suggests a very stiff challenge.”

So is it hopeless for hyperlocals, especially those that want to have a real community impact – beyond, say, finding the best area Starbucks for Moca Coconut Frappucinos?  I say no – for two reasons.

Reason No. 1:

Palser conflated key numbers from the Pew study that turned it on its head.  Nowhere does the report say – in Palser’s paraphrase – “only 20 percent of American adults reported using digital tools to communicate with their neighbors or stay informed about community issues at least once in the past year” (emphasis added).

Here’s what the study actually says:

  • “22% of all adults (representing 28% of internet users) signed up to receive alerts about local issues (such as traffic, school events, weather warnings or crime alerts) via email or text messaging.
  • “20% of all adults (27% of internet users) used digital tools to talk to their neighbors and keep informed about community issues.”

It’s clear from the overall thrust of study that the author – research specialist Aaron Smith – views these numbers positively.  In fact, the title of his full report emphasizes: “One in five Americans use digital tools to communicate with neighbors and monitor community developments.”

“One-in-five” means that 20% of Americans are or have the potential to be highly engaged at the hyperlocal level.  At first glance, 20% may not sound like much.  But 20% engagement from a base representing all adult users of the Web represents what Pew, in another study – called “power users.”  From the study, which used Nielsen data:

“These people return more than 10 times per month to a given site and spend more than an hour there over that time. Among the top 25 sites, power users visiting at least 10 times make up an average of just 7% of total users, but that number ranged markedly, from as high as 18% (at CNN.com) to as low as 1% (at BingNews.com).”

Reason No. 2:

The two big “national” crises – health care and education – have their roots not in Washington, DC but locally – in doctors’ offices, hospitals and schools.  Health and K-12 spending totals about 21% of the U.S. gross development product.  Most of the dollars are spent locally, and many of the decisions driving that spending are made locally too (in those doctors’ offices, hospitals and schools).

Yet when you look at most hyperlocal sites you don’t see much being done to engage audiences that are waiting to be engaged, or presenting content that emphasizes the local roots of the biggest national crises.

It is encouraging to see SeeClickFix empowering citizens to flag community problems like potholes, missing pedestrian crossings and pollution spills in a creek, and stay on top of them until they’re fixed by the authorities.  More than 50,000 local issues have been resolved in 50 states through SeeClickFix-engaged citizens.

It’s also encouraging to see the Lawrence, KS, Journal World launch its WellCommons, “where community and journalism work together to create a healthier Lawrence and Douglas County.”  Through its engagement-conscious strategy, WellCommon has 131 health advocacy groups – everything from Locavores to “NoTrauma” (covering physical and emotional abuse as well as non-intentional injuries like vehicle crashes and other accidents) – that have attracted 2,612 members.  Nineteen groups contribute a post at least once every two days.

But we need SeeClickFixes that go beyond non-emergency 311-type issues – that face up to the challenges of local emergencies like K-12 schools that leave many minorities, as well as white students, poorly educated.

We need WellCommons that encourage the creation of community advocacy groups that are committed to helping improving health care and containing its rapidly rising costs – even if it means raising some local dust.

When that starts to happen, then we can all sit down together and enjoy our Moca Coconut Frappucinos.

Tom Grubisich authors The New News column on Street Fight. He is editorial director of Local America, which is developing a website to rank communities on their livability across 20-plus categories, including K-12 schools, health and wellness, housing, fun and vision. The rankings will be dynamic, going up and down daily as they are updated through a combination of open data, journalism and feedback from Local Experts and users of the site.

  1. June 9, 2011

    “According to a survey
    by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, only 20
    percent of American adults reported using digital tools to communicate
    with their neighbors or stay informed about community issues at least
    once in the past year.”

    This just doesn’t ring true to me. Even if we eliminate all digital tools EXCEPT Facebook from consideration, I think the number is higher than that.  I suspect survey respondents are defining “community issues” rather narrowly to mean “I talked to my Facebook friend about what’s happening at City Hall” or something similar.

    As for how many people report visiting hyperlocal blogs, I think that number is always reported lower than reality. Most people who go to a news site probably don’t even know whether it’s a blog or not.

  2. Jane Stevens
    June 10, 2011

    Thanks for the mention, Tom. We’re seeing good traffic, for a local health site that’s a little more than a year old — about 120,000 page views a month. I also want to point out that our engagement strategy is built-in — we give our WellCommons community the same tools that we journos use, and they have full access to the main part of the site to post their info and stories. It’s been so successful that the local sustainability community asked if they could have a similar site. Our second social journalism site, SunflowerHorizons.com, debuted about 6 weeks ago.

  3. Anonymous
    July 7, 2011

    I would be more into hyperlocal if a company would actually stick to credible news and commentary. Take a site like Topix. They claim to be an aggregator but take a look at the forums they have, there isn’t much legit news on most of them, but tons of libel, defamation, bullying and you have to have a stronger filter/moderation system and user registration before you are ever going to be anything other than a bullying site. There are some others I participate on that actually are useful. To me when people speak of “local” they aren’t necessarily referring to their own town if it is a small town, but the entire general area and major city they most closely identify with. For example, if someone lives in a small town around Louisville, Kentucky,  they don’t need a forum for their actual town but a place to discuss issues in the general area and national advertisers need to hit the general area. In other words, it is throwing money away to spend money on each individual town. You advertise to the “local” big city in that general area. Using Topix for example, having an unoderated forum in a small town is useless. All you are going to get is gossip, but if you have  one giant forum for a city and the surrounding towns, you get better discussion, easier moderation, and more appeal to advertisers.

  4. clem
    September 11, 2013

    Do you want to be a member of Illuminati as a brotherhood that can make you rich for ever it can also mark your name famous in the world contact us now +2347061824880 or email ayelalaoracletemple@gmail…YMCB

  5. Perry Bralia
    March 16, 2014

    Join the Illuminati cult online
    today and get instant sum of
    1million dollars with a free home
    anywhere you choose to live in
    the world and also get 2500
    dollars monthly as a salary… If you are interested please kindly fill the following
    information to this email below
    {email address removed}.. Full name………………………………
    Country………………………………… State of
    origin………………………. Date of birth………………………….
    Sex………………………………………. Address……………………………….
    Phone………………………………….. Email
    address……………………… Tell us little about yourself…contact us now if want to be famous.
    OR luminatiforsuccessandfamous@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Realtor Reaches Clients Through SEO Marketing, Hyperlocal Blogs