Why Are Local Search Results Polluted With Bad Content? | Street Fight

Personal Fight

Why Are Local Search Results Polluted With Bad Content?

3 Comments 29 August 2012 by

Like many of you, I was grateful to Google for cleaning out the content farms that were gumming up search results with thin, nearly useless answers and information on widely asked and easily monetizable questions. Search results, while not perfect, are a whole lot better. And, to be honest, I think a lot of what drove the shift in public sentiment against the content farms was a growing expectation from Netizens that content showing up high in search results be useful, relevant, and of high quality.

Which leads me to ask — why are local search results for everything except restaurants and hotels so polluted with bad content? Let me give you an example. When I search for a doctor, I get at least four or five listings for various health ratings sites. The sites usually have very few ratings, and its hard to tell if the ratings are reliable. The sites usually don’t provide me with particularly useful or relevant information about how hard it is to get in to see that doctor, where the doctor practices, and what their sub-specialities are. And there is rarely a social graph overlay to help me find out if trusted peers and friends had gone to that doctor.

The same is basically true for mechanics, electricians, stores, and everything else — with the exception of restaurants and hotels. To me, this is the logical next step in cleaning up search results. Unfortunately, it is a step growing increasingly complicated for Google, which has purchased Zagat’s and Frommers, two of the more popular content repositories for food and travel recommendations, respectively.

Angie’s List attempts to tackle the quality local content problem but because it hides behind a paywall, the service struggles to penetrate deeply into the Social Graph. Some of the classic business listing services, like Manta.com and Business.com, are well-intentioned but actually end up adding to the problem by layering nearly useless listings into the top results. Social request startups like Aardvark seemed to have an innovative way to tackle this problem but, as they were bought by Google, that train has stopped moving. And even there, it was less search and more Q&A. Therein, too, lies the problem. Really good local is half Q&A, half search and includes enough activity and ratings and comments to provide more than temporal relevance.

To be fair, diligent local merchants, like my favorite local garage, Masters International in Marin County, do an excellent job of policing their Yelp reputations. This helps me recognize quickly which local merchant is responsive and will probably be reliable. However, from search results alone, it was hardly a slam dunk that I was able to find them and figure out that this local merchant offered a high quality service. And even Masters could give me more information on what they are really good at and which models and makes they see the most business one.

In that respect, some of this local listings and search results failure is on the merchants — so many of which still do not have viable websites and do not take the time to maintain any sort of web strategy, if even for 15 minutes a day. But a very good place to start in all this might be a way to provide a confidence or relevance rating based on the content of the pages themselves or the social graph placement of the company relative to your social graph, rather than just relying on the bare naked PageRank of the site. There are a number of local startups thinking along these lines. I’ll be writing about some of them in upcoming columns.

Alex Salkever is an executive at a cloud computing company and a former technology editor of BusinessWeek.com. The views expressed in his column are his own and not those of his employer. His Personal Fight column appears every Wednesday on Street Fight.

  • Alexander Kowalak

    What do you think of
    Isn’t that a good thing, provided g+ gets the popularity of fb one day?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alex-Salkever/503373859 Alex Salkever

    I always liked Google Plus and still do. The UI is nice and clean. As you say, there just aren’t enough people on it. I am also concerned that as Google buys more content companies, the ratings system could get a bit skewed.

  • Amber Emly

    Content is important in PR or SE


Denver — March, 5th, 2015
Learn from the pros, network with partners and clients, and ski! Don't miss our second annual event on this important topic.
Register now and save!


Get hyperlocal industry headlines in your inbox every morning. Subscribe to the Street Fight Daily newsletter.

See how brands compare in local presence across areas such as local SEO, data accuracy, social engagement and more. Presented by Where2GetIt and Street Fight. Click here to see the battle!

Free White Paper: Contextualization

Learn how to deliver better, revenue-driving consumer experiences. Download "Contextualization: Leveraging Location-Based Technology and Mobile to Drive Success for Brands."

Sponsored by Artisan Mobile.

Follow Us

Get the latest Street Fight news, information and analysis via Twitter and Facebook.

The Commerce Graph

The “Commerce Graph” is a new framework we have developed to think about the future of physical exchange. The model offers an alternative to the dominant narrative about the commerce landscape that frames digital networks as an adversary of physical exchange.

The $20 Billion Mobile Marketing Opportunity

Strategies and insights into the landscape of targeting options and how they deliver foot traffic and sales for SMBs.
Check out our 2013 report and get your copy today!


© 2015 Street Fight.

Powered by WordPress. Hosting by Page.ly